Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 12:39

Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Street Dog Who Fought to Survive by Eating Rocks and Dirt Has Us in Tears - PetHelpful
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
6 Foods You Should Be Eating for Bone Health, According to Dietitians - Yahoo
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
ChatGPT wasn’t built for this, but it’s now the center of my daily routine - Android Authority
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Dental experts reveal 6 essential tips to prevent tooth loss in aging adults - AOL.com
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Woman banned for life from cruise after 'breaking rule' she shared on social media - LADbible
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Thank you.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Can ringing in the ears be a sign of spiritual awakening?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
China’s asteroid-and-comet hunter probe unfurls a ‘solar wing’ - theregister.com
What’s next?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.